Reason why 24-years-old Arsenal midfielder Kai Havertz Should Have Been Sent Off during Arsenal vs Brentford after obvious incident (2-1)

The forward scored the game-winning goal in a 2-1 Premier League win, but he was lucky to even be on the field because he dived.

Some people think that Kai Havertz of Arsenal should have been sent off for his “clear act of simulation” before scoring the game-winning goal in a 2-1 win over Brentford.

The German international scored in the 86th minute, taking Arsenal to the top of the Premier League standings on March 9. He did this after avoiding a second yellow card for jumping.

The former Chelsea player got his first yellow card for elbowing Kristoffer Ajer in the last few seconds of the first half. After a while, he fell to the ground in the penalty box after what looked like a collision with Nathan Collins.

The replays of the incident made it clear that the two players didn’t make much contact with each other. Now, the Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel has decided that Havertz should have been given a second yellow card for his actions.

Kai Havertz should have been sent off against Brentford.

“A clear ploy to trick”

The KMI Panel is made up of five people: three past players or coaches chosen from a pool of five chosen by the top flight, as well as a representative from the Premier League and the Professional Game Match Officials Ltd (PGMOL). They meet to make important decisions. The votes are then used to make a final score that is used to decide how much money they get in bonuses.

Without a doubt, everyone agreed that Havertz should have been sent off by Rob Jones for his “clear act of simulation.” He shouldn’t have been on the field when Arsenal scored their second goal in the Premier League match.

“Havertz is already on the ground when the defender hits him and brushes his hip.” The panel felt that the decision made on the field was wrong and that Havertz should have been given a second warning for a “clear act of simulation.”

At the time, the angry Brentford players went to Jones for advice, and The Times says Collins could be heard yelling at the man in the middle, “It’s a f***ing disgrace!” After the Bees lost the game, manager Thomas Frank said what he thought about what happened. What he said:

“I thought it was a clear dive, so I called for a penalty.” It’s clear if you see that slowly coming back. It might be hard for Rob, the ref, but I think the linesman should have seen it clearly. I don’t think Havertz should have been on the field when he got the goal.

Dermot Gallagher, a former Premier League referee, gave his opinion on Sky Sports’ Ref Watch. He said that the Arsenal star couldn’t get a second yellow card because Jones didn’t give out an on-field penalty:

“He could say it’s a simulation, but keep in mind that the VAR says there is no penalty, so he can’t point out a second yellow card.” ‘It’s deception,’ he can only say if the referee gives a penalty, since the player lied to the referee.

“Then he can go back, give him another yellow card, and kick him out.” That’s the problem: there is no middle ground; it’s either all or nothing. It’s not a yellow card because he doesn’t give a punishment. I believe there is enough physical impact. If a player is to be sent off for diving, it must be a clear dive.