Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola break silence and make responds to Kevin De Bruyne “not impressive angry behaviour” after Man City vs Liverpool substitution – nextfootballnews
Connect with us

Liverpool

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola break silence and make responds to Kevin De Bruyne “not impressive angry behaviour” after Man City vs Liverpool substitution

Published

on

When the game was still in the balance, Pep Guardiola, the manager of Manchester City, discussed the possibility of bringing Kevin De Bruyne off the field against Liverpool.

As Kevin De Bruyne was explaining the reasoning behind the substitutions that he believed saved Manchester City a point against Liverpool, Pep Guardiola stated that Kevin De Bruyne was quite pleased with the game after it had concluded.

After taking the lead at Anfield, City was put under significant strain when Guardiola made a double substitute, replacing Kevin De Bruyne and Julian Alvarez with Jeremy Doku and Mateo Kovacic. The penalty that City gave away in the second half was a very cheap one, and the team was already under a lot of pressure. Specifically, De Bruyne was enraged by the decision to come off the field, and he engaged in a verbal dispute with Guardiola and his assistants on the sidelines. Later, the manager went over to have another conversation with him.

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola break silence and make responds to Kevin De Bruyne not impressive angry behaviour after Man City vs Liverpool substitution

In spite of this, the Blues made progress as a result of the substitutions. Kovacic made it possible for City to exert more control in the middle of the field, and Doku provided more of an outlet on the left side of the field. Regardless of how much Guardiola admires the mindset that De Bruyne possesses, he will not hesitate to remove him from the team if he believes that doing so is the most beneficial decision for the team.

Now that he is content. “There is no problem,” Guardiola remarked. “I find it appealing. When he is upset, it is a good sign.

It was because I was aware of what we were lacking that I took the decision. We were lacking the ability to hold possession of the ball, and we were unable to have it with him, Bernardo Silva, and John Stones. After that, we were able to do it more effectively. In regard to Kevin, what can I say? We require it, and we require him, and it is of the utmost significance.

“It is a challenging location to come, and he made an effort to do so. In the first half, he was extremely involved in all of the transitions, shots, and corners that were taken. We are aware of it. The moment I had in the second half, after we had conceded the goal, the game was not in our control, and I wanted to create something that may give us a little bit of control over the game. At most, this was the concept that was being discussed.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending