“It’s No Grand Slam Anymore!” — Kristina Mladenovic Slams US Open Over Controversial Mixed Doubles Shake-Up…Read More…
In a passionate and pointed statement that has sent ripples through the tennis world, French star Kristina Mladenovic has spoken out against the US Open’s newly introduced mixed doubles format, accusing the tournament of undermining the prestige of Grand Slam tradition. Known for her outspoken nature and a proud history of doubles excellence, Mladenovic didn’t hold back as she expressed her deep frustration with what she describes as a “disrespectful” change.
At the heart of the controversy is the US Open’s decision to shorten mixed doubles matches by implementing a single-set knockout format, eliminating the traditional best-of-three format. This move, according to organizers, is intended to speed up scheduling, reduce player fatigue, and increase TV appeal. But for Mladenovic and many in the tennis community, it feels like a step backward — one that threatens the very soul of doubles competition.
“This Isn’t What a Grand Slam Should Be”
Following her first-round mixed doubles exit alongside her partner Ivan Dodig, Mladenovic made headlines in the post-match press conference. Rather than speaking about her performance, she turned her attention to the format itself.
“Let’s be honest — this isn’t what a Grand Slam should be. You don’t call it a Grand Slam and then reduce it to one set. It’s an insult to all of us who dedicate ourselves to the sport,” she said, clearly exasperated.
The 32-year-old, who has claimed multiple Grand Slam titles in women’s and mixed doubles, including two mixed doubles titles at the Australian Open and French Open, emphasized that the reduced format strips away the essence of high-level competition.
“Winning a mixed doubles title at a Slam used to mean something — endurance, strategy, mental toughness. Now, with just one set, you can blink and be out. One bad service game, and you’re done. That’s not a reflection of quality. That’s luck.”
Support and Division in the Tennis World
Mladenovic’s comments have reignited a larger debate that’s been simmering beneath the surface of professional tennis for years — the role and respect given to doubles, particularly mixed doubles, in the modern game.
Several players, including her frequent doubles partner Caroline Garcia, voiced support for her views on social media.
“@KikiMladenovic is right — mixed doubles deserves the same prestige and respect. Grand Slam means tradition, not shortcuts. #RespectDoubles,” Garcia posted on X (formerly Twitter).
Veteran doubles legend Leander Paes also weighed in from India, telling reporters, “It’s a disservice to the legacy of mixed doubles. We’re not exhibition players. We’re athletes playing a team sport at the highest level. These changes feel more commercial than competitive.”
However, not everyone in the tennis community is in full agreement. Some younger players, particularly those focused on singles careers, have welcomed the change as a way to ease the demanding Slam schedule.
American rising star Coco Gauff, who has dabbled in mixed doubles, noted: “It’s hard to do everything in two weeks. Singles, doubles, mixed — it adds up. I get where Kiki’s coming from, but I also understand why they’re trying something new.”
US Open Officials Respond
In response to the backlash, the US Open released an official statement defending the format adjustment. According to tournament director Stacey Allaster, the change is part of a broader initiative aimed at innovation and improving the viewing experience.
“We understand the concerns and passion of our players. The decision to trial a one-set mixed doubles format was made after extensive consultation and review. We are committed to evaluating its success and listening to all feedback moving forward.”
Allaster further explained that the shorter format was designed to create more “bite-sized” matches for digital audiences, aligning with shifting consumption trends.
“In today’s world, attention spans are shorter, and we have to evolve. Mixed doubles is a fantastic product — this new format is simply an experiment to help it reach wider audiences.”
A Deeper Wound for Doubles Players?
For Mladenovic, though, the issue runs deeper than format — it’s about respect. Doubles, and particularly mixed doubles, often play second fiddle to singles in terms of media coverage, prize money, and general recognition.
This latest move, she argued, only reinforces that imbalance.
“We train just as hard. We sacrifice just as much. Why are our matches treated like warm-up acts? Mixed doubles is about partnership, coordination, chemistry. These things can’t shine through in 20-minute matches.”
It’s a sentiment echoed by other specialists, many of whom feel the format change reflects a broader undervaluing of their craft.
What Comes Next?
The backlash has sparked conversation not just among players and officials, but also fans, many of whom have taken to social media platforms to share their disappointment.
One trending post read:
“You wouldn’t cut a men’s final to one set for ratings. Why do it to mixed? Either value the game or don’t call it a Slam.”
As the US Open progresses, all eyes will be on how the format plays out — both in terms of competition and reception. If viewer numbers spike and scheduling runs more smoothly, organizers may deem the trial a success. But if fan engagement and player satisfaction dip, it could force a rethink.
For now, Kristina Mladenovic remains the face of the resistance — a player standing firm not just for herself, but for the legacy of the game she loves.
“We don’t play for gimmicks,” she said in closing. “We play for the love of tennis — and tennis deserves better.”
Leave a Reply